Home
Rob's Disturbingly Open LJ [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Rob

[ website | My Website ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Grand Theft Auto 4: Initial Thoughts [May. 12th, 2008|12:24 pm]
I haven't finished the game, and to be frank, I haven't really put much effort into finishing it. Why not, since apparently it's the second coming of Gamer Jesus?

1. It's too long. Epic milieu-focused games like this must be played in chunks of at least an hour, preferably 2+. I have six such opportunities per week, and some of them are going to involve friends, chores, other media, Rock Band, etc. I just don't have the luxury of dropping all my other commitments for a week and playing the heck out of a single video game.

2. It's too repetitive. Against a game with more theoretical variety than a schizophrenic chameleon, this is a strange allegation, but after a half-dozen "drive over here, shoot these specific dudes, don't get killed, drive to various shops, repeat" missions, the charm wears off. I didn't pay $60 to be forced to make my own entertainment all the time, although I do appreciate the ability to do so. Plus, a lot of the missions are too difficult for me, since I've never played a GTA game before and the controls are very frustrating. (Where are my checkpoints?)

3. It's too dark. Unlike most hardcore gamers, I haven't become totally numb to the horrors of running over pedestrians, I like humor that isn't despairing satirical commentary straight out of The Colbert Report sometimes, and I'd like to be able to spend some of my near-infinite blood money on a pretty apartment or something. After a few hours of play, I need to take a break and look at cute puppies for a while.

4. I've been rereading X-Men instead. Chris Claremont has his faults - our heroes basically have everything and the kitchen sink thrown at them, to the point where their normal lives in regular ol' New York seem out of character - but the power of character development and regular opportunities to test our heroes' moral mettle cannot be denied. The level of drama and pacing is about 2 minutes of X-Men to 1 hour of Dragonball Z. And I thought Lost and Heroes had big casts and copious twists!
LinkLeave a comment

Science Marches On [May. 12th, 2008|10:12 am]
Science News has a study saying that a country's efficiency is inversely proportional to its number of cabinet members. In a classic example of heavy induction, they started with this tiny, Economist-style "that's pretty neat" graph, then found some way to represent it in more repeatable terms (graph theory, with each minister as one node).

Intuitively, this makes sense: any small group can reach consensus pretty quickly, and any group of 20+ needs to have its own leadership. An odd number also really helps. (One manager usually has 10 or less underlings, the Supreme Court has 9 members, etc.)

However, it's not exactly an open-and-shut case, as the researchers mention: Canada, Australia and New Zealand all have big cabinets and high efficiency. I suspect this is more because they have fewer powerful ethnic groups, reducing the need to have shared oversight of crucial government functions. (Iraq, for instance, is bloated with 3 positions for every 1 real position, so that everyone can be appeased.)
Link1 comment|Leave a comment

Teh Scandalz [May. 9th, 2008|11:48 am]
This Washington Post article tries to drum up an alleged backroom deal between John McCain, a bunch of high-powered lobbyists/donors, and a lucrative land swap deal in his home state of Arizona. On the surface, this is a serious allegation - for someone against earmarks and lobbyists and whatnot, being swayed by "lobbyists that included [his] Senate campaign manager, two of his former Senate staff members... [and] a major McCain donor" does not help your squeaky-clean image. In fact, landowner Ben Ruskin said he specifically targeted McCain, who helped to shoot down the bill the first time it was introduced. Sounds bad, right?

However, it was disappointing to read just how fair this deal seemed once I read into it. As the Post is good enough to admit here, the bill was supported by the U.S. Forest Service, "many local officials," and the local newspaper. Before the deal, the land was in a "checkerboard" pattern of alternating square-mile plots, which are a major hassle for both parties. The land was eventually developed by a contractor who has also given heavily to McCain... 6 months after the bill was passed. Some environmentalists complained... but they were mad because the deal didn't have enough community involvement beforehand. McCain got lobbied... but he wasn't convinced, and held town meetings to address environmental concerns, eventually adding a provision for water management. Some local officials were worried that the deal was unfair... so McCain added an "equal value" provision that ended up trading 35,000 acres of forest for 21,000 acres of better land.

This story sounds like a lot of sound and fury resulting from a reporter's inability to dig up any substantial dirt on McCain. Faced with running yet another Democratic rat race piece, they printed this instead. The Post does have one significant advantage though: unlike the Times, they are careful not to make crazy insinuations, letting readers decide just how little this actually matters.
LinkLeave a comment

Religion Debate (old news?) [May. 5th, 2008|05:06 pm]
This debate on Newsweek between Sam Harris (inflammatory atheist author) and Rick Warren (fluffy Christian author) is interesting because both participants are willing to say the intellectually honest but politically incorrect answers. Rick Warren, unfortunately, is not much of a debater, and resorts to insipid Christian talking points and terrible arguments like Pascal's Wager, while letting Harris walk all over him. Here are some of my thoughts on the topic.

Read more... )
Link3 comments|Leave a comment

Magic, Part 3 [May. 2nd, 2008|01:38 pm]
As usual, feel free to skip this if you don't care about Magic cards, or even if you do, really.

Round 3: Boros vs Gruul )
LinkLeave a comment

Movie Review: Iron Man [May. 2nd, 2008|11:46 am]
Iron Man has perhaps the highest ranking of any action movie ever on Rotten Tomatoes' review aggregator site. Everybody can at least give it a thumbs up, albeit a "three stars" thumbs up. I can say that I had WAY more fun watching this movie on opening night with what sounded like the entire GMU comic book club than I would have had at GMU or at home on DVD. The movie relies on spectacle, goodwill towards Marvel Comics, and a very 21st century mindset.

As Slate's review points out, the movie is actually pretty faithful to the spirit of the comic book, a gleefully capitalist hero who takes the Batman "willpower plus gadgetry" superhero formula and removes all the borderline insanity and moody camera angles. The movie is long on explosions and rock music, short on plot, carried solely by the star power of Robert Downey Jr. and Gwyneth Paltrow. Fortunately, the movie gives them plenty of space for character development by keeping the number of characters and plot twists very low. Our hero is more interesting because he doesn't start as a Callow Youth or Distraught Orphan, but rather a Selfish Jerk - a very postmodern take, but the liberty is appropriate since the entire pantheon of superheroes is full of Proud Altruists so a more postmodern one can still feel realistic.

This movie definitely knows its audience. If you're 18 or older, and you enjoy superhero movies, you should see this one too. It won't do any genre-bending like Hellboy or Forbidden Kingdom, which are really other movies disguised as action flicks; it relegates the fanservice to in-jokes instead of lavishly indulging; and the CG is extremely well done. (To be fair, any movie based on shiny metal objects and laser beams is a perfect fit for CG.)

Sidenote: Movie Iron Man doesn't yell out the names of his powers anime-style, but we all half-expected him to. Our perception of these heroes has really been shaped by Capcom's video game tie-ins as much as their comic book originals. Anybody beg to agree/differ?
LinkLeave a comment

Graph of the Week [Apr. 30th, 2008|01:14 pm]
From The Economist:

Note that this is a pretty vague measure, with several commenters explaining that American gun owners are much more likely to have multiple guns than their counterparts in other countries. The first thing I thought of, though, is the Japanese stereotype of the Well-Armed American, ready for gang warfare at the drop of a hat. There is some truth to every stereotype. :-P
Link2 comments|Leave a comment

An interesting link to pass on [Apr. 29th, 2008|06:00 pm]
This far-right blog has a transcript of one of the Rev. Wright's crazier sermons.

At least Obama has the decency to disavow Wright as soon as he makes a national nuisance of himself. I'm wondering, however, whether Obama's faith might not be just as ornamental as G.W.Bush's, given that he apparently wasn't paying attention to any of these sermons for the past 20 years. You can't fall asleep every week.
LinkLeave a comment

Potential Letter to the Editor [Apr. 28th, 2008|05:13 pm]
Nancy Klimavicz's letter about her gifted son does not reveal what she thinks it does.

I speak from sympathy. As a fellow gifted underachiever in high school, I was never challenged by exams (perfect SAT and AP scores, for instance) but my GPA lagged behind. I followed the same public school path, ran into similarly stupid assignments and painfully slow classes, but still managed to finish my homework. I attended UVA, and I'm not surprised that these kids aren't doing so. Why? My GPA was a 3.7, theirs was a 3.2 or a 3.5.

Regardless of any "learning, not grades" philosophy, a student who can't be bothered to get an A in the one subject he cares most about is not making a compelling case for himself. In college, I was expected to rise above vapid assignments, not ignore them, and the students from whom I learned the most were the ones struggling through the homework along with me. A year at community college could be very profitable for this young man, letting him settle into the rhythm of paying attention and putting his best foot forward instead of "achieving" his way straight to academic probation.

Edit: The letter has, in fact, attracted several comments of this nature, so I may not need to send this in after all.

P.S. Anecdote: At work, people are awed by my test scores. Any ideas on how to explain that being good at taking tests is less useful than it sounds, without it coming off as false modesty?
Link1 comment|Leave a comment

Movie Review: The Forbidden Kingdom [Apr. 28th, 2008|10:11 am]
Halfway between The Wizard of Oz and Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon lies The Forbidden Kingdom, which I saw on a whim Saturday night but turned out to be just what the doctor ordered. It's a wonderful romp through an extremely standard, feel-good Chinese-mythology plot, with Jackie Chan and Jet Li hamming it up with gusto. This is OK, because unlike Dorothy, our anachronistic hero is nowhere near interesting or cool enough to carry the movie on his own. The direction and production design fall halfway between Chan's zany but heartwarming antics and Li's oversaturated, wire-heavy Eastern dramas, and it works just fine. Positively heartwarming, in fact; a welcome respite from stuff like No Country for Old Men.

Don't think of this movie as a summer blockbuster, think of it as musical theatre for nerds. Each new stereotypical cast member introduces themselves with a fight scene instead of a song; any plot developments are telegraphed 20 minutes ahead of time; and it all works out in the end thanks to Each Person's Valued Contributions.

More specifically: I personally got a big kick out of our nerdy, Sinophile hero, who name drops Virtua Fighter 2, Bruce Lee, and the Dreamcast. Rarely is this character lampooned so perfectly.
LinkLeave a comment

More Magic Musings (part 2) [Apr. 25th, 2008|11:06 am]
As usual, behind the cut.

Round 2: Dimir vs. Rakdos )
LinkLeave a comment

Magic Cards - Diary 1 [Apr. 23rd, 2008|07:50 am]
I recently acquired my first Magic cards, after realizing that the local Gamestop sold theme decks from my favorite set (2005's Ravnica) for $5. I've kept myself very budget-conscious, and I decided to make my own little environment where I could mix flavor and function, good cards and thematic ones. Following are my notes on how I'm developing this environment. Cut for the 99.9% of you who don't care.

Round 1: Azorius vs. Boros )
LinkLeave a comment

Life Update [Apr. 18th, 2008|05:11 pm]
Last Friday (was it really a week ago?) was my grandmother's funeral. Although I always called her "Grandmama" from my mom's suggestion "Grandmaman", which definitely suited her desire to be Upscale, Hip and Cultured despite any and all roadblocks. Overall, the event went well: a small, intimate, thoroughly desanitized memorial service at the local Unitarian church, full of relatives I hadn't seen in many years and cousins who were way older than I remembered them. My dad's crazy family is mellowing out with age, much like he has - my uncle Stephen has moved back from Brazil and plans to send his daughter to prep school, my uncle Matthew is almost able to hold conversations and even made some appropriate comments at his trademark earsplitting volume, my lesbian aunt Angela is turning out just like any other soccer mom, etc. Afterwards, we went out for Chinese (in honor of the recently deceased, who would take kids to 7-11 for breakfast instead of making pancakes). It wasn't entirely unexpected, but my dad took it pretty hard, especially since if old Marney can't live alone he'll have to move in with us.

That Saturday, there was the FCS Gala, the big yearly fundraiser for my choir. It was super awkward, since the main attraction was a silent auction, meaning that most of the stuff was way out of my price range and the young hip people were in their 40s. The band was having lots of fun playing jazz standards though, and I got to sing a number as part of a trio doing "I Could Write a Book" (not one of Sinatra's better moments, but charmingly cheesy in trio format). Unfortunately, that number was at 10:30 and I got there at 7:15, so there wasn't much to do except grab repeated munchies and wish I had lots of spending money.

On Sunday, the Royers were once again nice enough to invite Austin and I to the regular college-student lunch, which has since grown to include 20-somethings, ambitious 16-year-olds, and any of the Royers' adult friends who feel like coming. It's a very convivial, social atmosphere, marred only slightly by the high school contingent of raging dorks who, under the tutelage of New Hope's many techie fathers, are just as lame as I was at that age. I hope they are having just as much fun as I had.

The week past has been largely uneventful, although I have been spending way too much money lately, and I did finally cajole my dad into letting me teach him Magic. (Yes, I own Magic cards now, although they are Ravnica block only, on a strict budget, so I don't plan to fall into the Nerd Zone any more than I have to.) Surprisingly, he really liked it - the great moment of the night being when I cast a counterspell on his enormous, unstoppable Cleric after bluffing it for three turns. My dad is a poker fan, and I always try to get him to play my games, but they are very frustrating. I'm beginning to see Magic's appeal as a quick card game with a low number of external rules. Previous game favorites of mine rely on knowing a lot of Things about the game state that aren't immediately apparent from each individual piece of the world, which is very unfriendly and so I'll try to move away from them.

On that note, the Halo legendary map pack (which Austin just picked up) is a lot of fun, although I am bad at Halo and I really dislike their grenade/melee/guns rock-paper-scissors. Normally I am all for subverting the standard FPS model like they do by trying to introduce skills other than aiming at people's heads, but their reliance on "Halo physics" really grates on me. Weird distended jumping, having to collect weapons, relearning how to throw grenades, and nonsensical vehicle driving help to turn a well-balanced, fun experience (that doesn't require you to move faster than a hummingbird with ESP) into a game that actively shuts out people who don't play a lot of Halo. If only it had grenade arcs like Gears of War.

When I become a game designer (I'm actively looking at job opportunities in the field these days, after discovering that my salary prospects are OK as long as I don't become a tester) I will have to make sure not to emphasize reflexes that are specific to my game alone. This is what brought down the Lord of the Rings TCG, which I had a lot of fun with and spent a lot of money on: you think you'll have this gripping adventure with the Fellowship of the Ring fighting a bunch of trolls, but instead you have this complex strategy game based on single combat and managing your Hobbits' stamina, that just happens to be played with cards.
LinkLeave a comment

Most recent mass email from my mom [Apr. 9th, 2008|06:35 pm]
Dear Family and Friends,

It is with great shock and deep sadness that I have to tell you that Davide's mother, Jana Marney-Nelson, died unexpectedly on Sunday morning at home. There will be a Memorial Service this Friday, April 11, 2008, at 10:00 AM, at Cedar Lane Unitarian Universalist Church, 9601 Cedar Lane, Bethesda, MD 20814. Cards may be sent to Davide Marney, 10241 Stratford Avenue, Fairfax, VA 22030. We would appreciate your prayers at this time of sorrow. Thank you.

Sincerely,
janet
Link2 comments|Leave a comment

Bias, ur doin it rong [Apr. 7th, 2008|11:11 am]
There's a fascinating study from the University of Michigan on the amount of housework done by various groups of people. The included bar chart shows that women do significantly more basic housework than men, and that after you get married, both of you have to do more work. The article, however, reaches an entirely different conclusion: "Having a husband creates an extra seven hours a week of housework for women, [while] a wife saves men from about an hour of housework a week." This finding is based on the graph from 1976, included for comparison with the 2005 survey, not the graph from 2005 (which shows about a 3-hour increase for both genders). In fact, the entire last two paragraphs of the article are clearly based on the 1976 graph, with statements like "single men did more [housework] in all age groups than married men" the best indicator.

The article is chock-full of this sort of statement. There are plenty of "gender gap" supportive findings - as long as you fiddle with enough constraints:
Overall, the amount of housework done by U.S. women has dropped considerably since 1976, while the amount of housework done by men has increased... But when the researchers looked at just the last 10 years [among] single men and women in their 20s... they found a slightly different pattern.
There doesn't appear to be any link to the actual study from this page, so we'll have to take their word for it about the Pattern that is emerging from this very small subset of the population.

My Take: In 1976, getting married meant becoming a housewife, with a staggering 28 hours per week of housework. In 2005, this is no longer true, and married couples share the burden equally. Women still do more housework than men, but it's not because the Patriarchy is oppressing them.

There is one group, however, where the Patriarchy is still in effect: families with more than 3 kids, where the woman is back up to 28 hours a week and the man is back down to 10 hours a week. If you want to have a big Catholic family, in other words, make sure you can support it on only one job.
LinkLeave a comment

Another Silly Article [Apr. 1st, 2008|07:16 am]
From Indiana University, hard-hitting research concludes that Clueless Guys Can't Read Women. As pretty much every commenter has noticed, this study doesn't actually prove what's in the title.

The study asked guys to judge whether a woman's body language was friendly, sexually interested, sad or rejected, then revealed that they got it wrong more often than women did. Unfortunately, the study can't distinguish between whether men are unable to read them or whether women are unable to communicate to men. (Easy fix: Re-run the story with men's body language. If the women are still better at reading them, it's the guys' fault. If the men are equal to the women, it's the ladies' fault. If the men are better than the women, both genders are unable to communicate.)

Unlike many studies of this kind, this one deserves publishing because despite the flawed conclusions it has some novel and interesting results. Namely, men don't have "sex on the brain" when reading body language - they were just as likely to interpret alluring women as friendly as the other way around. In my (limited) experience, this is definitely true. I've had guys complain to me that women were sending "mixed signals" when the women in question revealed that "it should be obvious" what they were doing.
Link1 comment|Leave a comment

Controversy: Harvard's Abstinence Club [Mar. 31st, 2008|11:59 am]
I was linked to this New York Times article about the abstinence clubs, largely Catholic, at Ivy League universities. A couple things struck me about this one:

1. The article seemed somehow mean-spirited to me. Check out the part where the male co-president of the club confesses his lustful thoughts to the reporter, who cheerfully broadcasts them to the female co-president. Or how pro-sex think tanks and organizations are constantly quoted, but the evidence summoned to "back up" the club is a bunch of forum trolls and a website. I guess it's too much to ask for the New York Times to be even-handed about a very controversial, partisan issue.

2. This club is getting WAY more publicity than it deserves. They admit that core membership is about a dozen people - hardly enough to distribute flyers, hold regular meetings, etc. from my experience with Blue Notes. The only reason I'm interested in these people is the massive attention from the press, eager to find some story that mentions religion but doesn't require the reporter to know any real context.

3. The subject in general deserves a much closer look than most people are giving it. On the one hand, abstinence-only education has clearly failed, the culture is saturated with pro-sex values, and incidence of teenage sexual activity is exploding. On the other hand, abstinence is much more common than everybody thinks it is - as an unofficial "IM Counselor", a lot of people in my experience tended to be talking a bigger game than they were actually doing - and there are good, rational reasons for doing so that aren't because you love the Patriarchy and the Pope.

Granted, the Internet only exacerbates this mutual misunderstanding - like attracts like. My conservative, Christian-college-attending friends and my liberal, Ivy-League-attending friends both think the other side is uninformed at best and subversive at worst.

Edit: I thought it was SUPER ADORABLE when the one girl's boyfriend said that long talks with her were better than sex with some other girl. This guy is a keeper.
LinkLeave a comment

Meme: How White are you? [Mar. 31st, 2008|11:05 am]
From [info]cargoweasel, bold the things that apply to you from the currently trendy Stuff White People Like blog. (Disclaimer: This list does not apply to whites who are conservative, rural, and/or poor.)

long list )
Total score: 31/92. I have a strong suspicion that under this metric, most of my Asian friends are more white than I am. Certainly Steve Gong is about the whitest person ever. :-P
LinkLeave a comment

Politics is Back [Mar. 24th, 2008|11:54 am]
An interesting question was posed at Easter brunch: Given that neither Republicans nor Democrats are a truly Christian party right now, which party would be the easiest to change into one Christians can line up behind?

The general weight at the Marney table was that it would be better to rally behind Republicans, with their positions on social issues, capitalism and personal freedom (instead of victimization and centralization) as good ideological grounds from which to start. However, I'm beginning to think that the Democrats might be more likely to deliver results. They're serious about helping the poor and protecting the environment, and they haven't been taken over by the socialists like the GOP has been taken over by the neocons. Paradoxically, in such a shallow age, it might be easier to change the guiding philosophy than the resulting policies. After all, the religious right has been putting the GOP into power for decades, and what has it gotten us? Pretty much nothin'.

On the subject of Obama's big race speech, I read the transcript and it was actually a really good speech. Yes, his pastor is a total nutcase, in the league of Pat Robertson, who also argued that America deserved 9/11. But it is totally OK to have close friendships and even pastor/parishioner relationships with people with whom you disagree - as long as you have enough common ground to make it work. This speech raised Obama about 10 points on my credibility-meter instantly, and I think McCain has his work cut out for him after confusing Shia and Sunni on his latest visit to Iraq. (I do that sometimes, but I'm not a SENATOR.)
Link2 comments|Leave a comment

Public Service Announcement [Mar. 21st, 2008|05:03 pm]
On March 25th, Rock Band will let me download virtually the entire Boston debut album, the best-selling debut album of all time. To celebrate, I will have a gathering wherein we will play the whole thing straight through, and therefore be totally awesome. You should come. That will be all.

Unfortunately, there is still no Styx, Journey or Kansas to complement this fine classic rock experience. I have a bunch of Police songs though, so stop your uncontrollable sobbing.
Link1 comment|Leave a comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]